“I swear to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign or domestic” – and it seems to me that doesn’t jive with “some parts of the Constitution don’t apply”, like the 4th amendment. If, say, for example, Al-Queda [as imaginary as they are], were to take over our fine land, they would invalidate the constitution. That would mean our government had failed to protect and defend it, right? So, when Bush allows for an amendment in the Constitution to be invalidated, he has failed to protect and defend the constitution and is therefore in violation of his oath.
Is that a high crime? perhaps a misdemeanor?
And yet, the Washington Post doesn’t say shit about the crime undertaken.
screaming at low volumes
